Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections
Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vandalism [ ] |
User problems [ ] |
Blocks and protections [ ] |
Other [ ] |
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
Archives | |||
124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 |
101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
| ||
Note
- For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
- Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~
), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}}
is available for this. - Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
Unicode data semi-protection
This discussion was archived without a proper resolution. tl;dr all of the data files under Category:Unicode Module Datasets should definitely be at the very least indefinitely semi-protected, either directly or through some indirect means, because of their (very) high visibility. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 21:11, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
- Looking at that discussion, it looks like we want to protect at the template editor level, but the user who requested protection has not gotten around to requesting that level of rights. - Jmabel ! talk 00:35, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Protecting at the template editor level is fine too, at least for some of the data, but we shouldn't leave them unprotected until we get that sorted out. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 17:47, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done all protected at template editor level. That was tedious, we really ought to have a tool for mass protection. - Jmabel ! talk 21:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel Why? 😭 ToncianTaien (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Change it back to semi-protection right now! 😡 BashBuilder (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought the conclusion at the linked discussion was that this should be protected at template editor level, and that certainly was my read of Surjection's request here. BashBuilder I will accept your interpretation and lower this to autopatrollers. Certainly no one below that level should be messing with these. This is going to take me another half-hour or so. If someone wants this changed yet again after that, ask someone other than me. - Jmabel ! talk 05:12, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done - Jmabel ! talk 05:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I will upload files with Creative Commons and become an autopatroller soon. ToncianTaien (talk) 06:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Me too! I will upload over 1000 images with Creative Commons. BashBuilder (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- These two accounts are almost certainly operated by the same person who has socked extensively on en.wikt, but that's a whole another subject... — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 08:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Surjection Those 2 accounts are not a sockpuppet in en.wiktionary.org. BiggCooker (talk) 13:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Nevermind, one of their accounts was blocked here too. Maybe a Commons CU could look at it. (I suspect the account that responded to me above is them, too. I've had to block dozens of their socks on en.wikt alone.) — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 23:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- I have started a checkuser case, see Commons:Requests for checkuser#BiggCooker. Tvpuppy (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- These two accounts are almost certainly operated by the same person who has socked extensively on en.wikt, but that's a whole another subject... — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 08:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Me too! I will upload over 1000 images with Creative Commons. BashBuilder (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I will upload files with Creative Commons and become an autopatroller soon. ToncianTaien (talk) 06:06, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done all protected at template editor level. That was tedious, we really ought to have a tool for mass protection. - Jmabel ! talk 21:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Protecting at the template editor level is fine too, at least for some of the data, but we shouldn't leave them unprotected until we get that sorted out. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 17:47, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
So if BashBuilder and BiggCooker weren't legit, should this indeed be raised back to template editor? (Not that I'm volunteering to do the work yet again.) - Jmabel ! talk 18:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, I'll do it. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done, here's the script I used:
from pywikibot import config, Site, Category from pywikibot.pagegenerators import CategorizedPageGenerator, PrefixingPageGenerator from itertools import chain config.put_throttle = 5 commonswiki = Site("commons", "commons") pages = set(chain( # Get uncategorized pages under Data:Unicode data too, in case it was forgotten CategorizedPageGenerator( Category(commonswiki, "Category:Unicode_Module_Datasets") ), PrefixingPageGenerator("Data:Unicode_data"), )) for page in pages: print(f"protecting {page}") page.protect( reason="High cross-wiki use, see [[Special:Permalink/1077265368#Unicode_data_semi-protection]] and linked discussions", protections={"edit": "templateeditor", "move": "templateeditor"}, ) for page in pages: print(f"{page} has protections {page.protection()}") print(f"total pages protected: {len(pages)}")
- —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Only 21 accounts are banned after CU-investigation, User:BashBuilder is one of them. Still Support done protection to level "template editor" of all in Category:Unicode Module Datasets. Ping me if you need an edit and lack the right. Dusan has the right now too. Taylor 49 (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
- شهم الشهم العمري (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- الظبع العمري (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- شهم السهم العمري (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- هزاع الحويطي (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
These accounts are re-uploading the deleted files of globally locked user دامر العمري (talk · contribs). Marbletan (talk) 12:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done blocked and nuked these four plus two more I spotted with CheckUser. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
@The Squirrel Conspiracy: (or another admin). The user listed below appeared today and is re-uploading the same deleted files. Can you have a look? Marbletan (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- ساطي المساد (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Upload protection of File:Flag of Yemen.svg
Important file with high usage. Requesting upload and edit protection of autopatrolled users only. Kaim (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Discussing the issue of colors in talk page of file now. Abzeronow (talk) 00:43, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done Reverted to the last version before the revert war started and put under full protection. Happy to add alternate colorschemes to the see also section, but even if consensus forms for a specific version and the file is changed, this isn't a file that should be unprotected. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:05, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi protected Commons:AbuseFilter
Hi. I want you to semi protect the page named Commons:AbuseFilter. Also, please adjust: edit = auto confirmed users, move = autopatrollers. We should let them protected until 00:00, January 1, 2027. BashBuilder (talk) 09:26, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Why? Commons:AbuseFilter is a redirect which has never been edited since creation. Btw, what was your previous account? I can't remember... --Achim55 (talk) 09:54, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oops… I mean Commons:Abuse filter.
Reason: Prevent vandalism IPS. BashBuilder (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)will do. Almost no legitimate edits, fair amount of reverted vandalism. - Jmabel ! talk 16:26, 20 August 2025 (UTC)- @Jmabel Why? BiggCooker (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- You are asking why, if this hadn't already been protected, I would agree to add a level of protection that is actually lower than the one already provided. - Jmabel ! talk 18:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel Why? BiggCooker (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Nope. Level of protection is already edit = autoconfirmed, move = administrators. So this would be a lowering of protection. - Jmabel ! talk 16:30, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oops… I mean Commons:Abuse filter.
Block request for TryCatch12
- TryCatch12 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . Advertising-only account - has continued despite prior warning. Marbletan (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done by Herbythyme The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:59, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Semi protected User talk:Pminh141
Hello, my talk page has recently been frequently vandalized and spammed by an LTA. I would like to request that my talk page be protected and that the edits made by the LTA be hidden. Thank you. Pminh141 (talk) 13:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done Semi-protected for 2 weeks. Yann (talk) 17:35, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
RPP
Template:NOIRLab request page protection.
Reason: 23,000 transclusions. Waddie96 (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done Semi-protected. Yann (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Block request for Hopeful2day
- Hopeful2day (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) has a multiyear history of uploading copyright violations and improperly licensed photos and continues to do so despite multiple talk page warnings ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Final warning sent, one file deleted. Yann (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks @Yann. @Pushingforward appears to be a related account; it has repeatedly uploaded the same copyrighted image that Hopeful2day has; flagging in case you want to take a look. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done I blocked Pushingforward indef. for socking. Yann (talk) 08:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks @Yann. @Pushingforward appears to be a related account; it has repeatedly uploaded the same copyrighted image that Hopeful2day has; flagging in case you want to take a look. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
User:TS01800 and false claim of ownership at File:Thomas Sewell August 2025.jpg
TS01800, uploaded a file at File:Thomas Sewell August 2025.jpg and they claimed that the image is their own work (refer to Special:Diff/1076013160). They have gone on to reassert that it is their own work two more times at Special:Diff/1077081556 and Special:Diff/1077088119. This is contradicted by statements they have made on my user talk where they admit it is not their own work (refer to Special:Diff/1077086530). Can the file be protected so that they can't continually revert to make claims that it is their own work when it is not. TarnishedPathtalk 04:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath is disruptively editing my image, claiming that the source is a video on youtube with 4 views.
- I own the copyright for the original video footage in question and @TarnishedPathis falsely stating otherwise TS01800 (talk) 04:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- You have clearly admitted that the image is not your own work and have reverted twice to reinsert claims that it is. TarnishedPathtalk 05:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ok what would you be satisfied with then?
- I get the person who originally took the video and then transferred the copyright to me, to submit a statement that they authorise the image (that they no longer own the copyright for) to be used?
- Stop being disruptive TS01800 (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also please consider that this user did the same thing with the only other image I have uploaded where he falsely copyright flagged (Special:Diff/1041864671) a selfie, claiming that the source was from some random twitter account.
- @TarnishedPath is just being disruptive TS01800 (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- That other image was correctly deleted and only allowed back up after you submitted a VRT ticket. You need to dial back your combative language. TarnishedPathtalk 05:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- No, you got it taken down by citing an incorrect source. The same thing you are doing here TS01800 (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- @TS01800: The original creator of the video must be credited. They authorize its use with the ticket. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 05:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I will get them to also do that, thanks TS01800 (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- And you need to edit the file so that it states their name, not that it is your work. TarnishedPathtalk 05:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, will do
- Thanks for being so helpful TS01800 (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- And you need to edit the file so that it states their name, not that it is your work. TarnishedPathtalk 05:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I will get them to also do that, thanks TS01800 (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- @TS01800: The original creator of the video must be credited. They authorize its use with the ticket. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 05:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- No, you got it taken down by citing an incorrect source. The same thing you are doing here TS01800 (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- That other image was correctly deleted and only allowed back up after you submitted a VRT ticket. You need to dial back your combative language. TarnishedPathtalk 05:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- You have clearly admitted that the image is not your own work and have reverted twice to reinsert claims that it is. TarnishedPathtalk 05:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging @Ziv as an involved admin. TarnishedPathtalk 05:02, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath, The file has an open VRT ticket, and its review is the responsibility of the trusted members of the VRT team. I'm not a VRT member, so I can't verify the information. Please give them some time, as this is also voluntary work, and if anything is incorrect with the information provided, they will suggest the image for deletion. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 05:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Block request for Rastapopoulos25
Rastapopoulos25 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
@Rastapopoulos25 has a long history of uploading copyrighted work and continues to do so despite a prior block in 2024. This user is not here to contribute positively to the project. Moumou82 (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Request file protection.
File:Breezeicons-actions-22-help-about.svg Request file protection.
576,655 transclusions. Waddie96 (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Waddie96: Done —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 10:04, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
The omagol official
- The omagol official (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . This user is an obvious sock of globally locked Omagol (talk · contribs). He recreated the same repeatedly-deleted category (Category:Oviul maruf) as previous socks. See Category:Sockpuppets of Omagol. Marbletan (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done Blocked, category deleted. Yann (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2025 (UTC)