Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 21:10:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry
- Info created by Santiago Yaniz Aramendia – uploaded by Theklan – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 21:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Theklan (talk) 21:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 16:07:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deer)
- Info Quite an old picture but for me the composition and quality are there, and it's nice to have a male and a female in one shot! That's something we don't have so far in the category so for me it adds something new. created by Johann Jaritz – uploaded by Johann Jaritz – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- It's nice to have both together, and the composition is good.-Theklan (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:41, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 13:49:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Psammophiidae (there is no subgallery within Serpentes for the family these snakes are in, Psammophidae - not sure if this warrants the creation of a new family subcategory or if it should just be placed in the Serpentes category?)
- Info created by Ethmostigmus – uploaded by Ethmostigmus – nominated by Ethmostigmus -- Ethmostigmus (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice quality and good sharpness on the heads of the snakes, plus a good composition. We always create a new subgallery for the family, even if it will only include one picture so far. I've done that for you. If the picture passes, the new subgallery will need to be created, but I can handle that too. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 12:35:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery#page section here>]]
- Info created by Darrell Dodds – uploaded by Kersti Nebelsiek – nominated by MisawaSakura -- MisawaSakura (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- MisawaSakura (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: At only 0.37 Mpx, this photo is far below the 2.0 Mpx needed for an FPC. Please read the rules before making any new nominations. --Cart (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 09:15:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting people
- Info created by Ness Kerson/madNESS Photography for AusAID – uploaded by Russavia – nominated by Chipmunkdavis -- CMD (talk) 09:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- CMD (talk) 09:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:41, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 08:16:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Rosaceae
- Info created by 掬茶 – uploaded by 掬茶 – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 08:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 08:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- great composition. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:38, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool pic. Wolverine X-eye 14:44, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Pretty trees and nice quality but in my view not really outstanding enough for FP, sorry. The sky is featureless and dull, and there are a lot of untidy objects at either side of the rails. Although the composition is fine, I struggle to see a centred composition of railway tracks as particularly great or as something that stands out. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The composition is nice, and the photographer can't clean the rails. -Theklan (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 03:30:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Calidris
- Info Semipalmated sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) vocalizing. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 03:30, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 03:30, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2025 at 02:36:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info Truck-after-truck roll onto the dock at Port Angeles, Washington USA with loads of raw logs that self-loading cranes lift into the holds of the Happiness Bulker bound for the Far East. In a few months, the wood will return as furniture. c/u/n by --GRDN711 (talk) 02:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:55, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:52, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Really sorry but I don't see what separates this one from a good QI. The picture is high quality and illustrates the ship well but the ship does not appear a particularly outstanding subject - it's a container ship like many others - and I miss an outstanding composition or excellent light (it's a bit grey and flat) Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The Happiness Bulker represents more than just a ship. It is a symbol of how the world trades today and (hopefully) prospers. Somewhere between 80 – 90% of global trade involves commercial ship transport. The Happiness is a good example. Look here to see the system at work.
- The Olympic Peninsula of Washington State USA has trees in quantity as a renewable resource. Countries in the Far East have manufacturing capability but lack lumber in quantity to process. This ship connects the two. Eventually, finished furniture will be sent to market, also by commercial ship.
- Yes, this image was taken on a dull day - common weather in the Pacific Northwest. From your comments, I did implement some minor tonal tweaking that I think were helpful. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The Happiness Bulker represents more than just a ship. It is a symbol of how the world trades today and (hopefully) prospers. Somewhere between 80 – 90% of global trade involves commercial ship transport. The Happiness is a good example. Look here to see the system at work.
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2025 at 12:56:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
- Info View of the city of Baltiysk and the Baltiysky Lighthouse from the Baltic Spit. Created by Adrian Romanov for Russian Geographical Society – uploaded by Niklitov – nominated by Niklitov -- Niklitov (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Niklitov (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment My instinct is that there is too much sky and that a crop roughly like the one I proposed (see image note) would improve this candidacy Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, Cmao20! Agree, but the CropTool doesn't work... Niklitov (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose i understand why this photo is nominated. But it is a little overprocessed, a little oversaturated. There is also a composition problem: too much sky. -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2025 at 12:50:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
- Info created by Center for Contemporary History for Russian Geographical Society – uploaded by Niklitov – nominated by Niklitov -- Niklitov (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Niklitov (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the composition here, although there is probably a bit too much sky. And the subject is interesting. But this is a very small photo (only 4.4 megapixels) and the iPhone quality has not been sufficient for it to be fully sharp even at this small size. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao20 -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see it for FP -Theklan (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2025 at 10:54:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info A busy morning in the Gothenburg inlet. By European standards, Gothenburg is a relatively young city, founded by Sweden in the 17th century to secure a port on the west coast. Built at the mouth of the Göta älv, at the time Denmark surrounded the city on both sides, and the fortress Nya Älvsborg (visible in the background) was constructed for its protection. Also prominent in the background is Skandiahamnen, with its container terminal—evidence of how the port has gradually expanded outward from the city center. Today, Gothenburg is still Sweden’s largest and most vital port. I believe the old prime lens paired with a large sensor does an excellent job of separating the scene’s elements—keeping everything sharp and in focus, while avoiding the compressed perspective often associated with zoom lenses. As a subtle nod to Gothenburg-based Hasselblad and Fuji, I chose the 24x65 format (the XPAN format they introduced in 1998). Created, uploaded, and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 10:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 10:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support A pleasing and well composed illustration of a working port Cmao20 (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:31, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:34, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2025 at 08:29:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info These Marines, begrimed and weary from two days and two nights of fighting, are typical of the conquerors of Eniwetok Atoll.
- Info created by Ray Platnick, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 08:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support good restoration --Ezarateesteban 22:12, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 04:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:14, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:34, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:52, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support This image highlights the Marines' resilience and offers valuable WWII historical insight. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2025 at 01:07:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
- Info On my recent trip to Stratford, Ontario, I made a couple attempts at producing enormous panoramas of notable architecture. This one is 75 megapixels, a little more than 3x the native resolution of my camera, and I think the quality is wonderful. As for what it depicts... the Perth County Courthouse was completed in 1887 based on a design by George F Durand. It is adorned by numerous terracotta relief by Henry Plasschaert, who later became a professor at the School of Applied Art in Pennsylvania. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:32, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice architecture, superb quality and detail Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The trees make this image that much better. Wolverine X-eye 18:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 19:59:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Duos (depictions of two people)
- Info Portrait, oil on canvas. Title: Child with Toys - Gabrielle and the Artist's Son, Jean. Painting made by Pierre-Auguste Renoir. Photo created by National Galley of art [1] – uploaded by Brwz – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment We have another version of this as FP: File:Gabrielle et Jean, by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, from C2RMF cropped.jpg. --Cart (talk) 20:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- It seems it is not the exact same painting. May be a study or an sketch for the painting. Yann (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- No, it's another version of the painting. Plenty of artists have made multiple versions of some of their works. Some notable examples are Madonna (Munch), Isle of the Dead (painting), Haystacks (Monet series). We have three of the Madonna as FPs. It's just worth mentioning FPs of other versions when a nom is made. --Cart (talk) 10:14, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- It seems it is not the exact same painting. May be a study or an sketch for the painting. Yann (talk) 08:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support I am not sure both should be featured but this one is clearly a better painting than the other one. Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support but the other should be delisted if this is featured. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:37, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:21, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 18:49:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
- Info A plant making patterns in the sand. Effect of wind, Gallipoli, Turkey. Created by Nevit – uploaded by Nevit – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Zquid (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:12, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Pretty and original but I miss something here Poco a poco (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support On the small side but I think it's pretty cool - a subtly beautiful pattern and a good composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:21, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 19:27:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Upupidae_(Hoopoes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Wow.--Ermell (talk) 19:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Great capture!!!! JayCubby (talk) 22:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support MisawaSakura (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Acroterion (talk) 02:12, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Rolf Kranz (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:59, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:09, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Funny bird, well catched moment -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Well-timed shot. Wolverine X-eye 20:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:36, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 21:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:43, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 18:51:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Hesperiidae#Genus : Lon
- Info Zabulon skipper (Lon zabulon), a small butterfly (wingspan 35mm). "Skipper" because of the fast, erratic flight pattern; "Zabulon" for reasons nobody seems to know. No FPs of this genus. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 18:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: This species is no longer in Poanes FYI. The Commons category was just never updated. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Great... You butterfly people really go out of your way to make life miserable for us maintainers ;-) You got your Lon section now. I'm not touching the Commons category though, from previous encounters with Lepidoptera folks, I've learned to treat everything to do with them as radioctive. --Cart (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter: This species is no longer in Poanes FYI. The Commons category was just never updated. — Rhododendrites talk | 14:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ezarateesteban 20:56, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Acroterion (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support High-quality capture of this tiny critter. Wolverine X-eye 20:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 18:41:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
- Info created by Unicorn Film Service – uploaded by Racconish – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment About 2 pixels of white in a little arc at the bottom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done, thanks! Ezarateesteban 16:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 04:21, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:45, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 17:33:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info Flock of lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) in a lake in Amboseli National Park, Kenya. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 14:05:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
- Info View of Gönningen and the Albtrauf, seen from the lookout-tower on the Roßberg in the Swabian Jura, Baden-Württemberg, Germany -- Milseburg (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Immense panorama, fun to explore at full size Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support That's a good view of the settlement below. Wolverine X-eye 20:49, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 04:22:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info Sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Location, De Kruidhof Buitenpost.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Background is distracting, overall something special is lacking for such a common species imo, sorry --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support It is a shame that the background seems a little bit posterised in places but I like the composition. It's good to see a sunflower from a different angle Cmao20 (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support MisawaSakura (talk) 23:15, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks fine but not enough to me for FP in terms of compo (too tight overall), quality (level of detail just ok) and lighting (nothing special like it could have been the golden hour), sorry Poco a poco (talk) 09:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 04:22:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Parasarpa
- Info created by MaheshBaruahwildlife – uploaded by MaheshBaruahwildlife – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Slight unsharpness on the left wing, but overall I think this meets the criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:37, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:53, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 02:14:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae_(Deer)
- Info created by User:Giles Laurent – nominated by Rodrigo.Argenton -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:14, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:14, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment - Foreground foliage is mildly distracting. Not really evident at thumbnail size, but it blocks part of a leg. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:16, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- It is barely touching the bottom of the foot and in nature it's normal to have foliage so I don't think it's distracting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done: foreground removed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- That works at thumb, but I'm not convinced at full resolution. If it were merely removed from the foot area, would that work? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:28, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Giles Laurent, and thanks for the ping on my talk page. I was referring to the area where the former foliage was being out of focus compared to the remainder of the grass to its sides. That being said, I may be looking too much at specific details; unless you knew that was there in the first place, it is easy not to notice it. As such, I'd like to...
- It is barely touching the bottom of the foot and in nature it's normal to have foliage so I don't think it's distracting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ezarateesteban 18:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Magical surroundings Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The composition of the deer amidst the blossoms creates a serene and harmonious landscape. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The pink tree is so weird. I love it. Wolverine X-eye 20:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 00:53:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created and uploaded by Suresh Kumar Vakalapudi – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support I love the colours of South Asian festivals. Such a strong contrast between the bright reds and yellows of the floats and the blues and greens of the land. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:17, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 07:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Colours + composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I like it, but there's a lot of foreground. Suggested a crop via annotation - curious what others think. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:33, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Lovely composition. Wolverine X-eye 20:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:46, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
File:Baspa Valley under snow, Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg (delist and replace)
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2025 at 00:24:22
- Info This is an unusual D&R, but in my own opinion, the pano is better of the two. If I had made and uploaded the pano originally (rather than as result of suggestion on nom), I would have nominated only the pano to begin with. I believe it didn't get a fair chance due to much of the voting having already taken place before it was nom'd as alt. So here I give it a fairer, second chance. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:24, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace My preference is for the panorama, as stated in the previous nomination Cmao20 (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 08:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Both are good, but the panorama is the better composition. – Aristeas (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 21:20:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Dasyatidae
- Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:25, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 06:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Wow, that's actually kinda cool. Wolverine X-eye 18:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Huge wow Cmao20 (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Great job keeping the abovewater section free of lens drops. JayCubby (talk) 22:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Zquid (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 20:14:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports (I am not sure which specific gallery to categorise professional wrestling in, as it intersects both sport and entertainment)
- Info created by KevMullen23 – uploaded by KevMullen23 – nominated by CeltBrowne -- I am nominating this image for several reasons. Firstly, it is technically proficient in its own right, shot by a high-quality Sony ILCE-7M3 camera. However, and more importantly, this is an extremely difficult image to capture: In boxing and professional wrestling, the subjects are usually partially obscured by the ring ropes. The photographer in this instance has managed to capture the subject in a brief time when this was not the case. This is the type of shot a photographer works all night to get during a professional wrestling show. Thirdly, this image was taken during the subject's retirement. This was the photographer's last opportunity to capture the subject as a performer. This is a once-in-a-career shot of the subject. The photographer has managed to capture the subject at their apex, in full retirement costume. Therefore, the image is both technically excellent and also extremely poignant as it captures the subject at an extremely significant and emotional time in their life. This is an extremely rare image to have, and we at the Wikimedia Commons should be grateful the photographer, KevMullen23, has made it available to us. CeltBrowne (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- CeltBrowne (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
New to FPC
|
---|
|
- Support Having done my own attempt at wrestling photography earlier this month, I appreciate how difficult it is to get good shots unless you are right next to the ring. Although her eyes are slightly OOF, I think this is an excellent example of a challenging subject, and it does a great job highlighting the exuberant keyfabe that usually comes with the sport. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 14:15, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support MZaplotnik(talk) 09:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Never thought I’d have to vote for a wrestling picture (wrestling? OMG …), but the photo is good. – Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:54, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support An unusual but compelling wrestling photo. Before seeing this picture, I had no idea how popular wrestling is in Japan. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 18:53:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail_vehicles#Switzerland
- Info In my opinion very satisfying composition and good quality. created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:38, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:25, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:25, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:45, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:38, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support The church tower precisely over the locomotive is unfortunate, otherwise good Poco a poco (talk) 09:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 16:53:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Pteropodidae_(Megabats)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:53, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support 😛 JayCubby (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:22, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support cute --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Obviously great Cmao20 (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support High educational value, striking and memorable pose. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not sure how I missed this photo. Wolverine X-eye 20:54, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 15:49:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
- Info Not long ago I've nominated another picture from the set, but in my opinion this one shows the group of Athene noctua instead of the single bird, so it's not interferring into the field of the first picture. Created and uploaded by Maksat Bisengaziyev – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 15:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 15:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support although there is a dust spot on the top edge. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the sharp eye, deleted the spot. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support A little bit noisy, but it's not bad noise and I'd rather have that than the over-sharpened junk we sometimes get. Cute. --Cart (talk) 21:59, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:44, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support piu piu --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:50, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The noise is in my opinion insignificant and does not spoil this excellent photo Cmao20 (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:15, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cart and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 10:20:01
- Info Exterior of Nymphenburg Palace, Munich; photo created, uploaded and nominated by Richard Bartz (original nomination). As discussed here, we have two almost identical FPs, this one and File:Image-Schloss Nymphenburg Munich CC edit3.jpg. The latter is actually an edited version of this photo, both FPs are very similar, so we should delist one of them. The discussion has shown a clear tendency to delist this version: it is slightly underexposed and appears less polished. Furthermore, from today’s perspective, the nomination that led to the FP promotion is somewhat weak (it is confused, contains vote counting errors, comments from anonymous users, etc.), while the nomination of the other version is fine. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nomination - definitely no need for two near identical FPs and this one is worse. Cmao20 (talk) 11:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Cart (talk) 14:10, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom.--Peulle (talk) 15:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Yann (talk) 15:45, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist in line with the prior discussion on FPC talk. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. — ERcheck (talk). 13:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist per nom.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 06:08:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Anthozoa
- Info Corkscrew tentacle sea anemone (Radianthus doreensis), Anilao, Philippines. It's found in Japan, and south to the waters of New Guinea and northern Australia. This species is commonly found at depths of 5 metres (16 ft) or less in muddy bottoms, and is commonly seen without fish present. This species remains at the surface of the sediment, with the column buried and can retract entirely into the sediment. c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice, but could you please provide more space around, especially at the top? --Yann (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:35, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:49, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:45, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Zquid (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2025 at 02:59:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Children
- Info created by Ricardo Stuckert – uploaded and nominated by me -- Yacàwotçã (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Yacàwotçã (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment A really nice portrait photograph. It would be great if you could improve the description of the image so that it describes the person we are seeing here (it’s not Lula, of course ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 13:22, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Aristeas, based on this tweet and this post, I believe a reasonable description would be this, as it was not possible to identify the identity of the girl in the photo: “Young Tikuna, presumably about 10–12 years old, from the Wotchimaücü Indigenous community, located in the Cidade de Deus neighborhood of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.” There are other photos of her, from which I infer her age. It was a public event, and Stuckert is a professional photographer, so it is quite reasonable to believe that consent was given for the photo. As for the title, I imagine that renaming during a nomination might cause problems! Yacàwotçã (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- You are right that a normal photo renaming should not be made during a nomination, but if you write here what the new file name should be, I can take care of it right now for you. (I'm one of the FPC maintainers) --Cart (talk) 14:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- W.carter, something like “Wotchimaücü Indigenous community young Tikuna girl in feather headdress” seems reasonable to me. If I find out more about the girl, I’ll let you know! Yacàwotçã (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Cart (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- At full view, there are many small blue, red, and white dots in the background. What are they? Petro Stelte (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- And as I see, not only in the background but also on the girl. Petro Stelte (talk) 14:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Those look like hot pixels. Didn't realize they could come in blue. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- They come in a variety of colors. I think I've got them all now. --Cart (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Yacàwotçã, for the additional information! And also many thanks to Cart for the crucial improvements to the nomination and to the image! Now this is an excellent FP. – Aristeas (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- They come in a variety of colors. I think I've got them all now. --Cart (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Those look like hot pixels. Didn't realize they could come in blue. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Cart (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- W.carter, something like “Wotchimaücü Indigenous community young Tikuna girl in feather headdress” seems reasonable to me. If I find out more about the girl, I’ll let you know! Yacàwotçã (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- You are right that a normal photo renaming should not be made during a nomination, but if you write here what the new file name should be, I can take care of it right now for you. (I'm one of the FPC maintainers) --Cart (talk) 14:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Aristeas, based on this tweet and this post, I believe a reasonable description would be this, as it was not possible to identify the identity of the girl in the photo: “Young Tikuna, presumably about 10–12 years old, from the Wotchimaücü Indigenous community, located in the Cidade de Deus neighborhood of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.” There are other photos of her, from which I infer her age. It was a public event, and Stuckert is a professional photographer, so it is quite reasonable to believe that consent was given for the photo. As for the title, I imagine that renaming during a nomination might cause problems! Yacàwotçã (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for saving this very beautiful picture. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Only criticism left is a slight OOF on the mouth and nose... but at 8k pixels, does it really matter? The only way a reuser would notice is if they were printing on like A1 paper. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:38, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support heylenny (talk/edits) 16:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Why don't you create a set with this one too? heylenny (talk/edits) 17:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see them working as a set with the current definition of Sets, and it doesn't work as another standalone FPC from this photo-op since the idea is to select the best photo from similar taken at the same photo shoot. The selection process is also part of the nominating process. --Cart (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition and use of depth of field; the portrait is both technically strong and culturally significant. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 14:15, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Not convinced about the top crop, I saw in the series other images with the nice head deco uncropped but otherwise good to me for FP Poco a poco (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2025 at 14:40:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Charadrius
- Info all by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 14:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:57, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support heylenny (talk/edits) 16:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Well-composed, aesthetically pleasing. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin – and beautiful light. – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Those eyes are so cute. Wolverine X-eye 20:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2025 at 13:31:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Cuculidae_(Cuckoos)
- Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support heylenny (talk/edits) 16:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice! Wolverine X-eye 20:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2025 at 04:16:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Pieridae#Genus : Delias
- Info created by Souvick Mukherjee – uploaded by Souvick Mukherjee – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support—روتانا (talk) 09:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:41, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support heylenny (talk/edits) 16:02, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support-- E.IMANCOMMONS 21:47, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2025 at 00:25:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
- Info created by NateBergin – uploaded by NateBergin – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 00:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 00:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I don't feel strongly enough to vote, but when looking at stained glass photos my preference is usually for those that manage the light better than this. The glass itself is fine, but I'm never too keen on seeing the windows look like they've just been plopped onto a pitch black background, because that isn't the way any of us actually experience looking at stained glass in a church, and because it sometimes indicates that the colour contrast has been turned up too high. Compare to 1 and 2 which have less contrasty and saturated colours and where the exposure has been controlled so that the stonework around the windows is still visible, rather than being turned to black. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- I understand your point, but I think pitch black background is a common technique, looking at the FP category. heylenny (talk/edits) 04:32, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- You are right, but I wouldn’t have voted for a lot of those, either. But it does seem that most voters don’t mind as much as me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yacàwotçã (talk) 01:46, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very effective in full view, with clear details and accurate color rendering. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:17, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 06:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:55, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Zquid (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 22:53:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info created by Staff Sgt. Braden Anderson – uploaded by Nomad112 – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 22:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 22:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Shame it is a bit noisy but it's a large file and the wow-factor is huge for me, great composition too Cmao20 (talk) 00:33, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support JayCubby (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I've decided to oppose this image. I just can't overlook the poor image quality. Sorry. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support MZaplotnik(talk) 07:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 22:16:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species : Panthera pardus (Leopards)
- Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not just a sharp photo in the wild but a really good composition Cmao20 (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 03:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Loving the coat pattern. Wolverine X-eye 17:05, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Also great light. --Yann (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support awesome composition; good lighting. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Sure?--Ermell (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure I understand this vote. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:27, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Whoops, I've fixed it. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:38, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 19:27:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info created and uploaded by Harshit SR – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Arguably the white balance is a little bit towards the cyan side but I honestly love the effect it has here - such a majestic panorama and you get the impression of the crisp, clear, cold air by the sheer blueness of the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 03:46, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support—روتانا (talk) 09:51, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding motif, but technical quality is below the FP-bar. There are too many artefacts in the sky. In addition, the potential to add geographical information to the image (coordinates, annotations) has not been exploited rudimentally. --Milseburg (talk) 12:51, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- I believe @Harshit SR: may be able to address the second concern viz coordinates, at least. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- I've tried to remove the remnant artefacts. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support A view to savor. Wolverine X-eye 20:59, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 19:06:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Caves
- Info Obir flowstone caves, municipality of Eisenkappel-Vellach, Carinthia, Austria: View through the "Shark's Mouth" onto the "Sinter Lake". All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Like an alien world. Nice colours and composition. Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 03:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Good quality considering the circumstances. – Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 13:38, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:01, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Love the bright greenish color of the water. Wolverine X-eye 21:01, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 15:52:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Other land vehicles
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice motif, composition, and light, although I can see chromatic aberration on some edges. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berthold Werner (talk • contribs) 09:13, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Nice subject and arrangement, immediately evoking memories of Sicily. – Aristeas (talk) 13:12, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Something different. --Yann (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Good picture, but I think the crop at the left is too tight --Llez (talk) 07:30, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 08:53:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
- Info created by Tisha Mukherjee – uploaded by Tisha Mukherjee – nominated by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:29, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 03:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry but the level of detail is not up with many of the already existing FPs in the gallery and there are no other elements (e.g. catch) that make it more interesting. Not enough for me to get the star. Poco a poco (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- I welcome your opinion. There are many good pictures of Bee-eaters in the gallery but could not find this particular specie. This is just a piece of information, I am not asking you to change your opinion. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Poco is spot on. You need to look closer Tisha Mukherjee. There are several excellent FPs, such as this one, that provide an FP benchmark.
Hard to see how anyone could place this nomination alongside them.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)- That is an excellent image with shallow depth of field, but I find this comment "Hard to see how anyone could place this nomination alongside them." rude. I have nominated and let you experts decide, that's why this entire procedure is for.
- And criticism is always welcome. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:31, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- Poco is spot on. You need to look closer Tisha Mukherjee. There are several excellent FPs, such as this one, that provide an FP benchmark.
- I welcome your opinion. There are many good pictures of Bee-eaters in the gallery but could not find this particular specie. This is just a piece of information, I am not asking you to change your opinion. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good and nice composition. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2025 at 08:26:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Germany
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Really sorry. I find the motif interesting but the surroundings less than excellent. This kind of weather where snow is starting to melt and is dotted around in messy patches on the ground is rarely appealing. Overall it's not an outstanding composition for me because the background detracts from the image. Cmao20 (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Agree that the partially melted snow makes the composition a bit messy. But after three years of occasional cemetery photography (my typical stroll goes through a cemetery) I know it is often very difficult to get a nice clear photo of a grave; most often you have either dark shadows or harsh sunlight (or an unfortunate mixture); therefore I appreciate that the winter day with the snow shows all details of that interesting grave of a very interesting author. – Aristeas (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Cmao20 --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:42, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2025 at 14:50:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info created by Julesvernex2 – uploaded by Julesvernex2 – nominated by Peterpumpkineater919 -- Peterpumpkineater919 (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Peterpumpkineater919 (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I'm not impressed. There are just a few people standing in front of an entrance. I've seen more people standing outside the church at Easter because not everyone could fit in. Even without the people, it wouldn't have a wow effect for me, even though the portal is beautiful. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for the nomination, Peter! These COVID-19 lockdowns only happened a few years ago, but already feel so distant. I've compiled a few images from that period: there's plenty of fear and emptiness in there, but I find images like the above particularly interesting, as they show how we worked around the restrictions in place to find confort in old habits --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:32, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Wouldn't be upset to see it promoted but it's not one of Julesvernex2's best photos in my opinion. It is a good document of those unpleasant times when we were prevented from doing so much, and the image quality is very high as usual for this author, but I miss anything outstanding in terms of composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but as a standalone photo this doesn't work. Even with the caption, it doesn't look that significant to me. The people are still standing in a bunch, like if they were a group casually pausing in front of the church. The things we remember from the pandemic are the social distancing and empty places; none of that is present here. With their back turned to the photographer, we can only clearly see one masked person. --Cart (talk) 13:33, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Impresses me because of the contrast between the bright, almost monochrome beauty of the portal, the dark indicated beauty of the interior, and the colourful mundane clothing of the people. Of course as a document of the hot phase of the pandemic, some others of Jules’ shots are more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but there's not really much wow factor here for me.--Peulle (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose agree to Petro Stelte --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2025 at 00:41:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
- Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 00:41, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 00:41, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:22, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:35, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is really nice, and I also enjoy the lighting but both, eye and mouth (with a relatively big area), are in shadow. I'm also wondering whether the animal is captive or free, if the latter is the case where were you standing?! I wouldn't call this animal a pet. Poco a poco (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- Balancán is a small city located on the banks of the Usumacinta River. These animals live in a former wild swamp it is connected to the river. The swamp is surrounded by a wall, and I was standing on the opposite side of it. The crocodile was not in danger during the picture :^), I have fixed the coords, and uploaded a new version, is it better? Cvmontuy (talk) 18:54, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- The edit is an improvement but the POV and fact that key elements are in shadow is problematic, not a FP to me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 15:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good detail, very impressive in full-screen view. – Aristeas (talk) 17:09, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support I don’t think the composition is that great but for detail and quality I think this does deserve a star, am voting mainly because it is one vote short of promotion without me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2025 at 13:19:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created by – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support A very pleasant view Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:52, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but not outstanding for me due to the hash midday light, sorry. --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:59, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Uoaei1. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:51, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Splendid view, good composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The image features a striking gradient where sky and sea seamlessly merge, creating a visually compelling composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support The composition has a minimalist character. I think that's what makes this photo stand out. --XRay 💬 09:40, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support FP to me although the level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 16:36, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
File:Nikola Tesla, with his equipment EDIT.jpg (delist and replace)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2025 at 08:40:02
- Info Famous photograph of Serbian-American inventor Nikola Tesla in his laboratory in Colorado Springs around 1899, supposedly sitting reading next to his giant "magnifying transmitter" high voltage generator while the machine produced huge bolts of electricity. The photo was a promotional stunt by photographer Dickenson V. Alley. This is a double exposure: first the machine's huge sparks were photographed in the darkened room, then the photographic plate was exposed again with the machine off and Tesla sitting in the chair. FP on English Wikipedia.
- Info Better version restored by User:Bammesk. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 08:40, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:04, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:01, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace — Rhododendrites talk | 14:27, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace – Aristeas (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:48, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
File:Bombae performing during Queens and Kings of Pride, Windsor-Essex Pride Fest, 2025-08-09 20.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2025 at 01:41:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Other performers, most likely
- Info So, I'm riding a bit of a high, as my photographs of the drag show at my local pride fest turned out really well. This one I think is one of the best of the lot. It depicts Bombae, an Indian-Canadian drag queen who competed on Season 3 of Canada's Drag Race. Bombae is, well, bombastic in her garb and her performance, and I think that is well reflected here (I was also tempted to nominate File:Bombae performing during Queens and Kings of Pride, Windsor-Essex Pride Fest, 2025-08-09 40.jpg, which is from later in the performance). All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I don't see anything particularly striking about this. JayCubby (talk) 02:22, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:26, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment It's nice enough and all, but I find the white and pink blobs a bit too distracting, and the other photo you mention has a so, so much better composition IMO. In that photo, she's *emerging* in a way that she's not in this photo. Here she's almost going into hiding. A radical crop could save this one though and bring her out more. --Cart (talk) 14:57, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Cart, I've gone with a somewhat modified version of your suggested crop; I did a 1x1 to keep it a bit more balanced. I agree that this helps the portrait pop more. (Interestingly, both of her numbers went from poofy clothing to scanty, and both had something coming out of her head - the smoke cloud in the tree outfit and bubbles in the towel outfit). Also tagging Yann and JayCubby as a large modification like this should invite a revisit. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you, this is better. I wasn't that specific with the note, it was more a crop-ish suggestion. :-) (Looking forward to the other one too) --Cart (talk) 16:56, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support Impressive portrait with special light. Thanks to Cart for the ‘crop-ish suggestion’: it has helped a lot. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Why not nominate the other photot? It is better imo. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- I think we can have both. They are two very different expressions and looking at Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work, we've had several performances that have resulted in two or more FPs. --Cart (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- I had considered doing a set, but I wasn't sure how that would be received; usually sets are different individuals in a set (male and female speciments, etc.) rather than two views of the same person. I do like both, and if there is a consensus for nominating the other one, I definitely don't mind. I just wish the other headliners' shots had been this good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- I think we can have both. They are two very different expressions and looking at Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work, we've had several performances that have resulted in two or more FPs. --Cart (talk) 20:27, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:13, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 05:41, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Thu 21 Aug → Tue 26 Aug Fri 22 Aug → Wed 27 Aug Sat 23 Aug → Thu 28 Aug Sun 24 Aug → Fri 29 Aug Mon 25 Aug → Sat 30 Aug Tue 26 Aug → Sun 31 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sun 17 Aug → Tue 26 Aug Mon 18 Aug → Wed 27 Aug Tue 19 Aug → Thu 28 Aug Wed 20 Aug → Fri 29 Aug Thu 21 Aug → Sat 30 Aug Fri 22 Aug → Sun 31 Aug Sat 23 Aug → Mon 01 Sep Sun 24 Aug → Tue 02 Sep Mon 25 Aug → Wed 03 Sep Tue 26 Aug → Thu 04 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it by {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
- Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.